|
|
Post by 5racefan on Jan 29, 2008 23:05:14 GMT -5
i went to the track and looked at it and was wondering if they are gonna move the back wall in to the race track i think if not this may act like a ramp and we will be watching cars fly into the fence just my op
|
|
|
|
Post by jjstevens on Jan 30, 2008 7:50:33 GMT -5
i went to the track and looked at it and was wondering if they are gonna move the back wall in to the race track i think if not this may act like a ramp and we will be watching cars fly into the fence just my op Why didnt you ask Dennis when you were there? Was he not there? He usually is. |
|
54fan
Full Member
"Nobody remembers who finished second but the guy who finished second."
Posts: 136
|
Post by 54fan on Jan 30, 2008 14:44:39 GMT -5
Everytime I have been around, Dennis has said the wall is not going to be moved. I dont think it will be a problem at all
|
|
|
|
Post by mjsweetie on Jan 30, 2008 15:27:37 GMT -5
From the looks of the pictures I think there will be plenty of room. I also remember Dennis saying at the end of the season last year that the wall was gonna stay. I think things are gonna get very interesting this year. Everyone starting on a new track... sounds like a fun learning experience. Can't wait to see it!!!! See ya at the Bash!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by BIG D 32 on Jan 30, 2008 17:04:52 GMT -5
the back strech looks narrower than the front is it ?? or just the way the pics look?  looks real good though!!! |
|
|
|
Post by montecarloss on Jan 30, 2008 18:15:43 GMT -5
:)The track looks awesome, can't wait untill it is time to start racing!! I imagine the back wall will be just fine where it is at. It just gives us drivers a little more room to manuever.
|
|
|
|
Post by jjstevens on Jan 30, 2008 20:50:51 GMT -5
Those pictures are deceiving. There is more width than there looks from those shots. The reason is looks like that is because of the ton of banking in the backstretch  |
|
|
|
Post by BIG D 32 on Jan 31, 2008 11:53:32 GMT -5
Those pictures are deceiving. There is more width than there looks from those shots. The reason is looks like that is because of the ton of banking in the backstretch 10/4 i figured thats what it was!! |
|
|
|
Post by jjstevens on Jan 31, 2008 14:34:19 GMT -5
Those pictures are deceiving. There is more width than there looks from those shots. The reason is looks like that is because of the ton of banking in the backstretch 10/4 i figured thats what it was!! roger doger! See ya there Dan! By the way thank you for the awesome deal on that head, looks like its gonna work out great. Well see how much power shes got  |
|
looks real good though!!!
